I know the internet is full of rumours and conjecture, but I know how to tell when something is wrong.
I know when I’m being told something isn’t right.
So I have been trying to tell people when I am being told wrong.
It is important to understand the concept of “unbiased” research, which means you have a clear idea of the outcome that you are seeking to get.
It means you can take a look at the data, make an informed decision and then make a decision.
For me, this meant I looked at the results of a lot of different studies that had different conclusions.
I found that in most cases, the conclusions were the same.
That is because most studies, including the one I was reading, are done with very few participants.
If you are a professional statistician, you will know this.
If you are just a layman looking for the facts, you can find it online.
For instance, the study I was looking at was a meta-analysis of the research on sleep patterns.
I downloaded the meta-analyses of the studies that I could find online and analysed them.
I also checked the studies on their results, as the research was not done with an informed consent scheme.
The results showed that the participants of these studies reported feeling more awake during the night than at other times of the day, and that the sleep patterns of the participants tended to change as a result.
It was clear from these results that there was a link between sleep patterns and anxiety.
The meta-analytical results confirmed what I had suspected: that people’s sleep patterns were linked to anxiety.
But I had no idea what this link might be.
I was not really sure how to interpret the results.
So, I looked more closely.
What I discovered was that the researchers who published these results also had a bias against women.
They also had an interest in men.
This meant that the results were not all that helpful for the study, and I had to re-evaluate my position.
I asked a colleague what this bias meant for me.
He told me to be cautious because there is a lot that can go wrong with any study.
So he told me not to worry too much about this.
I did not worry about it.
And so, I am now one of those people who says: “This study does not support my theory, but it confirms my suspicions.”
I realised that the meta study was not a scientific study, it was a statistical study.
And it is not possible to predict whether a study will have an effect or not, or to make a statement that it does not.
There is no way to tell whether a positive study will be replicated or not.
So this is where my first bias comes in.
But the problem with statistical methods is that they are very difficult to interpret.
There are lots of factors that influence their results.
For example, in a study, the number of participants may be different from the number who did not participate.
In a meta analysis, the effect size may vary from the effect that you would expect.
A study done with a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is a study that is not a randomized controlled trial.
And that means that you can’t use the statistical methods to say: “OK, this is the effect of this study”.
If you do this, you are not actually doing science.
And this is a big mistake.
There is no one method to measure a research outcome.
And there is no single method to determine if a study has an effect.
So it is up to you to make the right decisions when you are doing research.
It is important for me to say that I have no evidence that the studies I read were all biased.
There was one study that was a randomisation of two groups.
I think this was very interesting and very useful.
I will be looking more closely at some of the other studies, and as I do, I hope to learn more about how to do more research and to look more closely into what happens in research.
But if you are interested in learning more about research, I encourage you to read my book.
It will be a good read for anyone interested in studying the psychology of decision making.
Follow @BBCNewsMagazine on Twitter and on Facebook